Clinical input
Assessment findings, patient goals, footwear and prescription choices begin the order.
Technology with human checkpoints
A clearer path from capture to fabrication
Digital tools can reduce shipping and transcription steps, but useful output still depends on a complete assessment, clear prescription information, and laboratory review.
Capture
An accepted scan, cast or impression represents the foot; exact current methods require confirmation.
File and order review
The lab checks whether the capture and submitted information are usable and identifies questions.
Digital correction or model preparation
The model is prepared according to the reviewed prescription and manufacturing method.
Fabrication and finishing
Shell, additions, accommodations and covers are manufactured and finished.
Quality control and clinic delivery
The device is checked against the order and sent to the clinic for fitting and follow-up.
What technology does well
Transfer, traceability, and repeatable workflow
A connected workflow can reduce duplicate entry, make order status easier to follow, and keep the capture with the prescription context. These are operational benefits—not proof that any particular capture method is clinically superior for every patient.
Current first-party status
Orthotic Energy’s current laboratory site presents AOMS® manufacturing and iPad-based 3D scanning alongside traditional hand craftsmanship. This was verified on 2026-09-20, but exact device support, file formats, training, scan acceptance and ordering eligibility still need direct confirmation before use.
Technology profile
AOMS status and evidence
See which manufacturing stages are currently represented by Orthotic Energy, how the public evidence was captured, and which compatibility and performance questions remain open.
Review the AOMS profile →Implementation guide
Digital clinic–lab workflow
Follow the handoff from assessment and capture through identity checks, review, fabrication, delivery, exception handling and follow-up.
Read the digital workflow →Questions to resolve before adopting a capture system
Confirm that the method creates a direct three-dimensional representation accepted by the laboratory and any applicable provider or payer requirement. Document operator training, patient and side identification, supported file format, file completeness checks, secure transfer, retention, recovery, and what happens when the scan conflicts with the prescription.
A useful pilot should include ordinary and difficult captures, interrupted uploads, incorrect-side prevention, duplicate orders, correction approval, and reproduction of a prior design. Measure avoidable clarification, repeat capture, transcription and turnaround—not only scan speed. Preserve a manual exception route so software failure does not encourage unsafe workarounds.
Privacy and continuity
A three-dimensional foot file connected to a patient or order may be sensitive information. Use the verified clinic system, least-necessary access, an appropriate retention plan and a documented deletion or export process. Before depending on proprietary hardware or software, understand licence continuity, data portability, support and how an order can be completed during an outage.