Canadian clinic and practitioner resource[email protected]

Clinic–laboratory workflow

A digital file is only one part of a complete order

Reliable digital ordering connects an accepted capture with the prescription, patient and side controls, review checkpoints, manufacturing records, and clinic follow-up.

Clinical review status: Orthotic Energy Editorial Team is responsible for this general information. A qualified reviewer and page-specific approval have not yet been recorded, so this page is excluded from search indexing and must not be used as patient-specific advice.

Begin with the clinical order, not the scanner

A useful digital orthotic workflow starts when the responsible provider documents the assessment, goals, laterality, intended footwear and relevant constraints. The three-dimensional capture is a geometry input. It cannot decide the prescription, resolve contraindications, identify the correct patient by itself or guarantee that the finished device will fit the intended shoe.

Seven controlled stages

  1. Prepare: confirm clinic/account authorization, patient and side identifiers, consent and the minimum information needed.
  2. Capture: follow the accepted method, inspect the result for missing areas, movement, scale or orientation problems, and retain a controlled retry process.
  3. Connect: attach the capture to the correct prescription and order rather than transferring it through ordinary email or an unrelated file-sharing account.
  4. Review: check that goals, device construction, accommodations, footwear and capture agree. A material conflict should pause production.
  5. Manufacture: preserve the approved order version while digital correction, model preparation, fabrication and finishing occur.
  6. Quality control and delivery: compare identity, side, construction and finish with the approved order before shipment to the clinic.
  7. Fit and follow up: the responsible provider assesses the device–shoe combination, explains use and records tolerance, concerns and any authorized change.

Worked failure case

A clinic captures the right foot twice but labels one file as left. The prescription requests different accommodations by side. A workflow that checks only whether two files exist can manufacture the wrong geometry. A safer system displays patient, side and capture preview together; detects suspicious duplicates; and requires the clinic to correct and re-authorize the order before design resumes.

Privacy and security boundary

The verified external application exposes authentication, prescription/order, patient, file, checkout and pickup workflows. Its public repair form separately requests contact information, an orthotic number, description and four photographs without displaying an authentication gate. Public code and interface inspection do not establish storage location, access roles, encryption at rest, retention, deletion, backups or incident response. Those facts must be confirmed before a clinic treats the system as approved for sensitive information.

This rebuild accepts no prescription, scan, patient record or credential. The clinic entry page links to the verified HTTPS application, while the privacy notice identifies the external boundary and known unknowns.

Acceptance test before routine use

Use a non-patient test order to confirm supported file type, scale, side display, required fields, upload interruption behaviour, duplicate handling, correction approval, order receipt and support escalation. Record screenshots and timestamps without real patient information. Repeat the test when hardware, software, file format or laboratory instructions materially change.

Editorial conclusion

Digital transfer can remove shipping and transcription steps, but its value depends on controls around the file. Prefer the workflow that makes identity, side, prescription version, exceptions and responsibility visible—not the one that merely produces a scan fastest. Review the related AOMS status profile before relying on a particular configuration.